Shape 8. shows the outcomes toward very first and you will next formant at the end of your vowel before /?/ plus the quality Polish and you can the latest alternatives.
As much as brand new frequency out-of F1 of one’s before vowel can be involved, the outcome suggest a lower life expectancy F1 regarding the the fresh variation out of compared to their Basic Shine relevant sound (NV 594 Hz against. SP 665 Hz, t=?2.730, p : t=?dos.204, p
The outcomes and indicated that the newest F3 frequency of the following vowel are significantly higher from the the new variants when compared with the product quality Shine variations. SP dos,831 Hz, t=2.763, p : NV dos,939 Hz compared to. SP dos,810 Hz, t=2.567, p . 325, p are significantly some other throughout the Practical Gloss and you will the latest variants; F1 frequency assortment try reduced in this new variation (/?/: NV ?87 Hz versus. SP ?33 Hz, t=?dos.086, p : NV ?121 Hz vs. ?67 Hz, t=?dos.086, p=.055 (at amount of statistical inclination)). Zero significant difference among them alternatives is actually located for the F2 and you can F3 volume set of the fresh preceding vowel. Likewise, the F1, F2 and you may F3 cute Utrecht women regularity ranges of the pursuing the vowel weren’t notably some other into the Practical Polish while the the new version.
Zero high variations was in fact found in the time of frication regarding both fricative and affricate: while Basic Shine /?/ has actually the average time of 0.098 s, the average worth of new variation is actually 0.101 s. New fricative a portion of the affricate was 0.061 s inside the Fundamental Polish and you will 0.058 s from the the latest version.
In every new analyses presented over the determine off Message Build and you may Fret is high just in a number of models. The outcome away from address layout try uniform somewhat having the analysis off Maniwa ainsi que al. (2009), and that indicated that English fricatives display additional acoustic attributes inside a good conversational against. a very clear style. REPETITION was more frequently tall, albeit solely, during the formants and stage, and a lot more seem to in affricates compared to fricatives; understand the outcome of the fresh analytical analyses into the Appendix C.
3.step 1. Linear discriminant investigation
The study showed more than things to tall variations in several parameters between your this new and Basic Polish sibilant. The reason for the following linear discriminant research (LDA) it to demonstrate and that of your examined variables would be the extremely useful in discriminating brand new version in the Standard Shine version and you can exactly what percentage of the data would be accurately classified by with this specific mathematical means. We used the LDA with jacknifed (we.e., log off you to definitely out) predictions. New LDA had previously been efficiently utilized for the latest discrimination away from English fricatives (Jongman et al. 2000; McMurray and you may Jongman 2011). In line with the data displayed a lot more than, we shall keep fricatives and you can affricates in independent communities.
In the case of the brand new influence of REPETITION is somewhat some other regarding Simple Gloss and you will new variant (t = ?2
All the acoustic parameters presented within the (4) had been included as predictors regarding the LDA no matter what fact you to definitely some of them were not significant about linear regression activities. The latest LDA outputs just one mode one to best discriminates one another alternatives from fricatives (Important Gloss compared to. brand new variant). Given that spectral height and COG highly coordinated collectively (0.79), the previous has also been omitted regarding model. As a whole, 19 predictors suitable the newest LDA, nine at which don’t notably subscribe to this new discrimination away from the high quality Gloss in place of the fresh new variation. And therefore, the remainder variables (10) was fitted toward latest model. The new model try highly significant (Wilks’ Lambda = 0.5251, ?2 = , df = 10, p rather than their involved the fresh variants.