- ^ The five sandwich-kind of fillers was indeed: hybrid agreement nouns which have a great possessive adjective (Julijin komsija “Julija’s neighbor,” in which komsija can be lead to M otherwise F contract), as with (15b); crossbreed agreement nouns that have a great possessive pronoun (moje cerekalo “my laugher,” where cerekalo normally trigger M otherwise N agreement), as in (15c); NSg animate nouns having an ordinal amount [prvo prase “(the) first pig,” in which prase has actually a crossbreed plural function, causing FSg or NPl contract], as with (15d); regular arrangement nouns that have a good MSg moderate fit [uspeh dekana “(the) victory (of your own) dean,” where in actuality the genitive match try homonymous to your paucal, and the paucal lets paucal and you can MPl agreement], such as (15e); regular arrangement MSg nouns having a good PP match (prijatelj iz skole “the fresh pal off college,” where destination outcomes would-be questioned), like in (15f).
- ^ The newest salience of advice are managed regarding the adopting the means. Basic, one to blogger designed the fresh instances based on the girl instinct, in addition to other analyzed them; where dispute came up, examples was replaced and procedure try constant toward freshly lead examples.
- ^ The importance of the difference between arrangement designs inside standing is orthogonal to the hypotheses regarding attract of the report, while they only generate forecasts concerning the cousin volume within requirements, otherwise amongst the standards while the legs-line rates. I report these types of evaluation in the interest of completeness of the statement, as the told from the publishers of volume.
- ^ You will find designed and you may given an alternate experiment in this way, and in addition we are currently checking out the info.
References
Arsenijevic, B., and Mitic, We. (2016a). “Aftereffect of animacy and you may agentivity towards the handling away from arrangement within the Serbo-Croatian,” into the Studies in the Dialects and Head, Chose papers out-of third Novi Sad Working area on Psycholinguistics, Neurolinguistic and you will Scientific Linguistic Search, eds S. Halupka-Resetar and you can S. Martinez-Ferreiro (Novi Unfortunate: Faculty off Values), 41–77.
Arsenijevic, B., and you can Mitic, I. (2016b). On the when you look at the reliance regarding gender with regards to number in contract which have matched up victims: a fresh study. J. Slavic Linguist. twenty-four, 41–69.
Ba). Morphology, contract and working memory recovery inside phrase production: evidence out of gender and you will instance when you look at the Slovak. J. Mem. Lang. 56, 65–85.
Barber, H., and Carreiras, Yards. (2005). Grammatical intercourse and you may matter contract into the Foreign language: An enthusiastic ERP evaluation. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 17, 137–153.
Bhatt, R., and you may Walkow, Yards. (2013). Finding arrangement within the grammar: an argument regarding agreement into the conjunctions. Nat. Lang. Linguist. Concept 31, 951–1013.
Bojovic, D. (2003). Neki slucajevi kongruencije koordinirane subjekatske sintagme s preponiranim i postponiranim predikatom you srpskom jeziku. Srpski Jezik 8, 539–555.
Lme4: Linear Blended-Outcomes Activities Having fun with S4 Groups
Carminati, Meters. (2005). Operating reflexes of your own ability steps (people > number > gender) and you can ramifications for linguistic idea. Lingua 115, 259–285.
Chomsky, Letter. (2001). “Derivation by Stage,” into the Ken Hale. A lives inside Words, ed. Yards. Kenstowicz (Cambridge: MIT Force), 1–52.
Citko, B. (2004). “Agreement asymmetries into the coordinate formations,” in Specialized Ways to Slavic linguistics: The new Ottawa Meeting 2003, eds A good. Olga, W. Browne, cpsfnmM. Luisacpefnm Rivero, and D. Stojanovic (Ann Arbor: Michigan Slavic Courses), 91–108.
De- Vincenzi, Meters. (1999). Differences between the newest morphology away from sex and count: facts out-of setting up coreferences. J. Psycholinguist tall single women near you. Res. twenty-eight, 537–553.
De Vincenzi, Yards., and you can Di Domenico, Age. (1999). A significant difference certainly one of ?-features: the fresh new role regarding intercourse and number regarding retrieval away from pronoun antecedents. Ital. J. Linguist. 11, 41–74.
Doron, Elizabeth. (2000). “VSO and you will kept-conjunct arrangement : biblical Hebrew compared to. progressive Hebrew,” in the Sentence structure of the Verb Initial Languages, eds A great. Carnie and you may Age. Guilfoyle (Nyc, NY: Oxford College or university Press), 75–96.