12Female undergraduates into the therapy ( N = 80) participated in the research having way borrowing. They were randomly allotted to among experimental conditions when you look at the a good dos ? 2 ? dos combined structure with dos anywhere between-category issues: commonality of destiny (prominent compared to. dissimilar) and you will ambiguity away from discrimination (not clear vs. unambiguous), and one within-class factor: version of attribution (attribution to help you discrimination vs. attribution to help you worry).
13When they arrive at new laboratory, for every single participant discovered herself on the visibility out of a woman confederate who starred the new section of an enthusiastic student within the mindset. A lady experimenter used all of the courses. This new protagonists was in fact informed that goal of the analysis are to examine predictors off future achievements instance development otherwise morality.
Throughout the “ ambiguous discrimination” status, the newest experimenter reported that she didn’t understand who had been going in order to stages the new invention test, the fresh new sexist judges or even the other judges (likelihood of discrimination: 50%)
14In new “ prominent future” status, brand new experimenter explained to both protagonists that they create get the same development sample rated because of the 1 of 2 male evaluators of a skilled regional research agency. For this reason, this new new member believed that she’d use the exact same sample while the the confederate and you will anticipated to be rated by exact same male judges just like the confederate.
Read moreMost of the college students was in fact Caucasians away from Eu supply